Audiences and in general, humans, look for the winner or
leader in everything. A winner is an actor who allows the audience to decode
their (encoded) messages from within their scripts in an effective and
symbolically interactive way. The scripts performed by the actors incorporate
specific devices to more effectively engage and transcend their messages within
their audiences. Thus, scripts, and performers alike, must act towards the
audience in a specific way to create the intended behavior the actor seeks.
These interpretations are highly dependent on the ways an actor plays to their
social, cultural, and biographical familiarity of symbolic understanding to the
script being performed (Mast, 2012). This symbolic content should incorporate
both an emotional and cognitive level of understanding in the audience.
Capitalizing on these aspects is what allows politicians to maintain and hold
power.
Politics through this cultural pragmatic lens can then be
described as a persuasive collection of performances set by political actors
with the intention to shape an audience's view, all in the context of a shared
system of collective symbolic representation (Mast, 2012).
In this analysis of an audience, the reaction from this
audience is in response to the front runners Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders'
eighth democratic debate. Their audience will be examined and explained through
the context of performance.
Joe Biden ignited feelings of passion, anger, and bluntness
from the audience that night in Manchester, New Hampshire. Biden’s new found
cries for urgent change were met by crowd applause and cheers. But at times,
the audience seemed unengaged or confused by sentences and claims that seemed
to trail off to nowhere. Biden’s visible stumbles were met with criticism from
the audience that attacked his old age and inconsistent track record. Why is it
that when an actor simply mumbles or stutters one of the first responses it to
say “Wow! Sleepy Joe doesn’t know where he is or what he’s doing.” (Trump,
2020) ? Critical audiences look for any crack in an actor and work to pry it
apart, Joe Biden is no exception. Above the critical audiences, it was clear
that from this debate his grasp of several audiences, primarily those of
different ethnicity, will work to elevate his campaign.
Former Vice-President Biden worked to paint himself as a candidate for the entire spectrum of race in America. Biden’s momentum behind the black vote was crucial in this debate as he worked to show the audience he was separated from the field of seven behind him. Biden’s actions on stage came at a pivotal time for his own campaign, as audiences looked on after a disappointing finish in the Iowa caucuses. Understanding his vulnerability, Biden emerged as someone who embodied urgency and spark. Biden elevated his campaign in this debate by using emotional calls to action that seemed to reach out and engage the audience.
Former Vice-President Biden worked to paint himself as a candidate for the entire spectrum of race in America. Biden’s momentum behind the black vote was crucial in this debate as he worked to show the audience he was separated from the field of seven behind him. Biden’s actions on stage came at a pivotal time for his own campaign, as audiences looked on after a disappointing finish in the Iowa caucuses. Understanding his vulnerability, Biden emerged as someone who embodied urgency and spark. Biden elevated his campaign in this debate by using emotional calls to action that seemed to reach out and engage the audience.
While Biden used a newly found fiery charisma to engage the
crowd, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-V) found momentum from the audience within his
cries of elevating the middle working class. The foundation of his campaign,
Sanders repetitively called to build momentum in his “sweeping” grass roots
movement. However, in a debate that was seemingly set on attacking the actor's
character rather than policy, Sanders took heat on his status as a
democratic-socialist. But Bernie Sanders' audience of followers has proven to
be fiercely loyal to the socialist from Vermont throughout the past four years.
In examining Sanders' audience's reaction, the reaction can be broken down to
two camps, those with and those against. Consistently after most Bernie Sanders
appearances audiences will either cheer and see his vision and script as the
future, or hiss and scowl and the thought of socialism in America. Audiences
can either agree or disagree on the actors factual content, but audiences may
have issues separating their thoughts on whether they “like” the candidate for
who they are as a person aside from any views they may have. Senator Sanders’
emotionally charged followers are an extremely devout group not only to Sanders
political views but also to himself as a person. Sanders' critical audience may
all disagree on any of his political views, but may have a hard time
distinguishing what they think of him as a person. For Sanders’ overcoming his
polarized audiences will play a pivotal role moving forward.
Senator Sanders’ political team after this debate must
strive to continue drawing in their strong hold of followers without forgetting
to reach out and win over new audience members. The American political stage
includes a giant middle that is extremely malleable and autonomous (Mast,
2012). After this debate Bernie Sanders has solidified two camps, he must see
that there is a third camp and audience available to be incorporated.
Citations
Mast,
Jason L. 2012. The Performative
Presidency Crisis and Resurrection during the Clinton
Years. Cambridge, Ma: Cambridge University Press.
Trump,
Donald (@realDonaldTrump) “Wow! Sleepy Joe doesn’t know where he is or what
he’s doing.” 2 March 2020, Tweet.
No comments:
Post a Comment